megcarlson.com

Posts Tagged ‘public health’

An open letter to Kristin Cavallari

STOP_FDear Kristin,

You recently announced that you do not intend to vaccinate your child because you have been listening to the rumors linking vaccination to autism.
 
I have some words for you:
 
Stop.  Just stop.
 
You are actively contributing to the spread of pseudoscientific bullshit that is threatening to set the country back decades in health outcomes.
 
Remember measles?  Yeah, we had completely eradicated that bad boy.  And now it’s back, with 16 new cases recently reported in NYC and 175 cases nation-wide in 2013.  The outbreak is commonly believed to be caused by whacakdoodles like yourself who believe that vaccinating your kids will cause autism.
 
Listen, girl, I am a hardcore conspiracy theorist (don’t even get me started about my thoughts on Big Pharma).  But there is no reason not to vaccinate your kids.  The whole reason parents bought this line of garbage was because of a 1998 research paper that has been thoroughly debunked.  That study was retracted and the author stripped of his medical license for “careless disregard” for the children in his study.
 
On the other hand, countless academic papers have discredited the notion that vaccines cause autism, as you can see in this comprehensive review of the literature.  But despite this, hippie crunchy parents around the country have completely ignored the evidence and adopted Anti-Vaccination as their own cultish movement.
 
Your choices would be fine if they were just personal, but they affect more than just your child.  Vaccinations exist because of something called “herd immunity.”  The idea is that by vaccinating everyone– the herd– you are protecting the most vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and infants, whose immune system might not be able to withstand the specific illness.  As a carrier, even if you yourself are  not sick, you endanger the lives of others and not vaccinating your kids has major public health implications.
 
Oh, Kristin– I loved Singled Out as much as the next girl, but I don’t take medical advice from goddamn Jenny McCarthy.  You’re better than this.  The Cutler babies deserve more.
 
Sincerely,
 
A Concerned Citizen
 
p.s. Would love to talk to you more about the Laguna Beach Days.  Tweet me @megscarlson

Heroin-omics

image courtesy of Jens Finke/ FLICKR

image courtesy of Jens Finke/ FLICKR

Two weeks ago, a friend mentioned an acquaintance having used heroin recently and I instantly recoiled.
 
“Who does heroin?!”
 
Steeped in long-entrenched stereotypes about drug abusers– junkies who walk the inner-city street, homeless tweakers– I couldn’t imagine anyone young and, to be frank, not poor, doing such a thing.  Heroin was a hard drug; a last resort (note: I’m embarrassed to have had such a naive problematic point of view and have since changed my tune).
 
But my friend assured me that heroin has become over the past decade a middle class drug.  A week of internet research confirmed: heroin is the young, white suburban recreational drug of choice for some very distinct economic and cultural reasons.  More light has been shed on the issue by the untimely demise of Philip Seymour Hoffman Sunday, suspected of dying from opiate overdose, preceded by the shocking (or not-so-shocking if you’ve been privy to his addiction issues) overdose of Cory Monteith not long before.
 
Heroin use increased precipitously in the mid-2000s (especially in Chicago, which leads the nation in emergency room visits due to heroin). From 2007 to 2012, the number of heroin users ages 12 and up jumped from 373,000 to 669,000– a shocking 79 percent increase.
 
The reason for this explosion is decidedly economic:  heroin is cheap.  As cheap as $5-$10 a bag.  Much cheaper than what it was in the ’80s.   The affordability, however, belies another important factor.  People are using heroin as a cheaper alternative to prescription painkillers, like OxyContin or Vicodin.  It is perhaps the only example I will ever use of people truly being “rational actors,” in the economic sense of the phrase.
 
I’m not going to delve into the cultural and historical factors behind the rise of prescription painkillers– that treatise would implicate the entire medical system in the America.  However, it is important to note that if public health experts want to address the heroin epidemic, the first step is the dangerous rise in prescription drug use in the country.
 
And it needs to be addressed quickly, because there are some very scary implications in this trend.  While prescription drug abuse is no laughing matter, prescription drugs are carefully dosed and regulated.  When you consume them, there is a pretty clear expectation of what is going to happen, and even the specific risks you incur.  Heroin, for obvious reasons, is a different story.  As a street drug, it is impossible to know the strength of what you are taking, or the ingredients in it.  Recently, there has been a particularly dangerous batch of Fentanyl-tainted heroin bombarding the Mid-Atlantic responsible for scores of deaths.
 
It makes me uncomfortable to use tragedies as a soapbox for change, but if there is any good to come from Hoffman’s death, hopefully it is the impetus to examine a growing public health concern.

Guess who’s coming to dinner?

Image courtesy of Ezra Gregg/ DC Central Kitchen/Flickr

Image courtesy of Ezra Gregg/ DC Central Kitchen/Flickr


Everyone’s favorite bougie grocer is coming to Englewood.
 
Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced Wednesday that the Whole Foods grocery store chain– known for its organic selection and high quality foods– will be opening a location at 63rd and Halsted St. in Englewood, not exactly a neighborhood known for Lululemon’s and Starbucks. The decision was the result of longstanding negotiations between Chicago and Whole Foods as part of the City’s initiative to eliminate food deserts in the inner-city, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. So far, the reaction is mixed, although mostly positive: Whole Foods, at the very least, promises to bring the option of fresh and healthy foods to an area in which corner stores and McDonald’s far outpace the availability of grocery stores or other healthy choices.
But then there is the elephant in the room, the big question: Will Englewood residents be able to afford it?
 
DNAinfo Chicago conducted an interesting cost comparison between Whole Foods prices for food staples and the prices of a nearby Aldi.  Big take-away: Whole Foods is expensive (some examples: $2.99 to $.89 for eggs, $3.49 to $1.29 for bread).
 
With that said, in my opinion (and I’d be glad to hear from anyone who knows more about the situation), it’s not going to hurt. In another neighborhood, Whole Foods could signify real peril– a symbol of gentrification that threatens to out-price and push out longstanding residents. But that is not the case in Englewood. Whole Foods is not putting anything out of business, because practically no other options for fresh or organic foods exist. The chain is not setting up shop there because it sees a growing affluent market, but rather is coming as a product of intensive negotiations with the City.  It is  not the sign of a changing neighborhood, but rather a potential agent of change in the neighborhood that has the highest incidence of diabetes-related mortality, according to the City of Chicago Department of Health & Human Services.
 
Or, at least, that’s what we can assume Emanuel hopes. Whether or not this will work is another story, but the old “something is better than nothing” adage may apply here.
 
I’d love to hear more from folks in the comments– I’m no expert on this subject, myself, and am open to others’ interpretations.

%d bloggers like this: